Student Presentations of a Paper concerning Biopharmaceutics
Objective
This week the objective is to deliver a short presentation of 4 minutes
duration. The subject of the presentation will be a paper from the literature
concerning Biopharmaceutics. This will be a practice presentation as it will
not be graded for credit. You will receive comments on your presentation, which
will hopefully, help you with the second graded presentation concerning
pharmacokinetics.
General Methods
Each student will have four minutes to present an important aspect from the
chosen paper.
Review your choice of paper with Dr Bourne for suitability. Once the paper
is approved you can use the on-line database to ensure that your paper has
not been chosen by someone else. You can then enter your choice
in the database
using the name and password given in class.
The presentation should include:-
- A introduction, i.e. a brief description of the drug and its use
- A description of the dosage form, subjects, type of study, methods used
- The results obtained in the study
- The conclusions resulting from the study
If a larger, more involved paper is chosen you should not attempt to present
all the material included but talk about a significant part of the material.
After the presentation there may be time for a question or two.
You will be able to use an computer presentation, overhead projector, or chalk board, to assist in your presentation.
WRITE-UP
No write-up will be required.
Journal Sources you might try:-
- Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy
- European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- International Journal of Pharmaceutics
- Journal of Clinical Pharmacokinetics
- Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics
Grading scheme
Introduction
|
Good start
|
Aims
|
Background
|
Methods
|
Clearly presented
|
Important details
|
Too much detail
|
Results
|
Clearly presented
|
Appropriate
|
Too much detail
|
Conclusions
|
Clearly presented
|
Material understood
|
|
Questions
|
Understood
|
Answered well
|
|
General
|
Appearance
|
A/V quality
|
A/V use
|
Technique
|
Confidence
|
Good transitions
|
|
Timing
|
Too short
|
Too long
|
|
Comments:
This page was last modified: 12 February 2001
Copyright 2001 David W.A. Bourne